Achraf Hakimi, the Moroccan footballer who’s been accused of rape, is going through a messy divorce with his ex-wife, Hiba Abouk. She’s demanding half his fortune, but he’s put it all in his mom’s name!

Hakimi’s a pretty wealthy guy, with a net worth of around $24 million. But apparently, he doesn’t own any of it himself. He transferred all his assets to his mom a few years ago.

So, what’s up with that? Why would Hakimi put all his money in his mom’s name? Well, some people are speculating that it’s a way to protect his assets from his ex-wife. If they get divorced, she won’t be able to get her hands on his money if it’s not in his name.

But Hakimi’s mom says that’s not the case. She says she was unaware of any action taken by her son to protect his assets, and that she only agreed to be the beneficiary because he asked her to.

So, what’s going to happen in this divorce? It’s hard to say. But one thing is certain: it’s bound to be an intriguing story.

Financial Update:

According to the latest reports, Hakimi’s ex-wife, Hiba Abouk, is demanding $8.5 million in the divorce settlement. This is based on the fact that Hakimi earns a reported monthly salary of $1 million from PSG.

However, it is unlikely that Hakimi will be ordered to pay his ex-wife any money, given that he does not own any assets in his name. If Abouk were to succeed with her claims, she would essentially be taking money from his mother.

It is also important to note that Hakimi and Abouk have two children together. This means that the court will likely prioritize the needs of the children in the divorce settlement.

Overall, it is too early to say how the divorce proceedings will play out. However, it is clear that Hakimi’s decision to transfer all his assets to his mother has complicated the situation.

This whole situation reminds me of the movie “The Wolf of Wall Street.” In the movie, Leonardo DiCaprio’s character transfers all his assets to his wife’s name in order to protect them from the FBI.

But, it all goes south for him when his wife divorces him and walks away with his entire fortune. Will Achraf find himself in a similar spot? Well, only time will tell how this whole situation unfolds.

MOST ASKED QUESTIONS

Q: Why did Hakimi transfer all his assets to his mother’s name?

A: There are a few possible reasons why Hakimi might have transferred all his assets to his mother’s name. One possibility is that he was trying to protect his assets from his ex-wife in the event of a divorce.

Another possibility is that he was trying to avoid paying taxes. It is also possible that he simply trusted his mother to manage his money for him.

Q: Will Hakimi’s ex-wife be able to get any money from him in the divorce?

A: It is difficult to say for sure whether Hakimi’s ex-wife will be able to get any money from him in the divorce. It will depend on a number of factors, including the laws of the state in which they are getting divorced and the terms of their prenuptial agreement (if they have one).

However, given that Hakimi does not own any assets in his name, it is unlikely that his ex-wife will be able to get any money from him.

Q: What will happen to Hakimi’s children in the divorce?

A: The court will likely prioritize the needs of the children in the divorce settlement.

This means that Hakimi and his ex-wife will need to come up with a custody agreement that is fair to both of them and their children. The court may also order Hakimi to pay child support.

Q: What impact will the rape allegations have on the divorce?

A: The rape allegations could have a significant impact on the divorce. If Hakimi is found guilty of rape, he could be sentenced to prison. This could make it difficult for him to maintain custody of his children and pay child support.

The rape allegations could also damage his reputation, which could make it difficult for him to find a new job.

Overall, the divorce proceedings between Hakimi and his ex-wife are likely to be complex and contentious. It will be interesting to see how the court resolves the various issues at stake, including the financial settlement, custody of the children, and the impact of the rape allegations.